Flaws with Recent Omega-3 Research Analysis
As one of the most popular health supplements and one of the most extensively studied, omega-3 has benefited millions of people. However, a new meta-analysis study from Greece, which recently appeared in The Journal of the American Medical Association has noted no significant reduction in mortality from omega-3 consumption.
So, the question is: Is there any long-term health benefit from omega-3 consumption?
Numerous media outlets are interpreting and reporting these results to show that omega-3 is ineffective as a supplement without presenting the deficiencies in the analysis itself.
The study showed a statistically significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality but research focused on the lack of statistically significant reductions in all-cause mortality, which led the media to report that omega-3 is not beneficial.
Before you cut out omega-3, consider these limitations in the analysis:
- The dose of omega-3 – specifically DHA and EPA fats – was less than 1 gram daily, which is not optimal for conferring maximal benefits, especially lowering triglycerides and reducing inflammation.
- Many of the studies included in this analysis did not have a long enough follow-up. The average follow-up was only two years when prevention studies involving heart and stroke patients are typically more than five years in duration.
- Many of the studies covered participants who were already sick.
Over the past 40 years omega-3 essential fatty acids have been demonstrated to provide health benefits for many types of individuals. New studies are continually conducted, so I would encourage you to continue taking your omega-3 supplements until more conclusive studies are conducted.
Do you have questions about supplements and the best choices for your specific needs? Call me today at 626.893.7244 to schedule a consultation.